Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Izzet Prowess | alexander rosdahl | 11-3 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | mcwright_ | 7-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Boros Forge , Domain Zur Overlords , Esper Pixie , Izzet Prowess
Meta Performance Analysis
Forbidden Orchard ranks #5085 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 99%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 45.6%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Forbidden Orchard is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 13.95 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.0%. Forbidden Orchard has a win rate of 55.8%, making it 18.8% better than other 0-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The One Ring | Legendary Artifact | 5 | 76.3% | 1 |
| Fierce Guardianship | Instant | 6 | 69.1% | 1 |
| Mana Vault | Artifact | 6 | 65.2% | 1 |
| Arcane Signet | Artifact | 8 | 64.5% | 1 |
| Red Elemental Blast | Instant | 5 | 63.8% | 0 |
| Gamble | Sorcery | 5 | 63.8% | 0 |
| Deflecting Swat | Instant | 6 | 63.6% | 0 |
| Phyrexian Metamorph | Artifact Creature — Phyrexian Shapeshifter | 5 | 63.3% | 1 |
| Mox Opal | Legendary Artifact | 6 | 62.6% | 1 |
| Mox Diamond | Artifact | 9 | 61.0% | 1 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Forbidden Orchard than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deflecting Swat | Instant | 3 | 5 | 64.5% | 58.4% | +6.1% |
| Chrome Mox | Artifact | 0 | 7 | 57.1% | 54.4% | +2.7% |
| Mox Diamond | Artifact | 0 | 7 | 57.1% | 54.9% | +2.2% |
| Arcane Signet | Artifact | 2 | 6 | 59.0% | 56.8% | +2.2% |
| Lotus Petal | Artifact | 0 | 6 | 55.9% | 54.7% | +1.2% |
| Flusterstorm | Instant | 1 | 6 | 56.4% | 55.5% | +0.9% |
| Rhystic Study | Enchantment | 3 | 6 | 56.4% | 55.5% | +0.9% |
| Pact of Negation | Instant | 0 | 6 | 56.4% | 55.7% | +0.8% |
| Force of Negation | Instant | 3 | 6 | 56.4% | 56.0% | +0.4% |
| An Offer You Can't Refuse | Instant | 1 | 6 | 56.4% | 56.3% | +0.1% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Izzet Prowess | 5 | 0.5% | 62.9% |
| Esper Pixie | 3 | 0.2% | 56.0% |
| 1 | 1.6% | 0.0% | |
| Boros Forge | 1 | 2.3% | 66.7% |
| Domain Zur Overlords | 1 | 0.1% | 62.5% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.